Over the past 6 weeks, I have addictively watched and
listened to well over 100 hours of mindless conversation between renowned Ricky
Gervais, Stephen Merchant and Karl ‘round-headed buffoon’ Pilkington. The
group’s unrivalled chemistry on their multiple productions has delivered great
moments, but due to the fact that they spent their first few years of
togetherness on XFM Radio, they were limited in the language they could use as
indicated by the frequently uttered, “Can we say that?”, often followed up by,
“I don’t think so.”
This got me thinking about the way in which people are
offended by language I don’t consider offensive. In the show, there are
countless instances which could easily be considered offensive (generally not
malicious) towards groups such as disabled people, homosexuals, and the Chinese
without any kind of swearing and often without any remark of, “Can we say
that?” This fascinates me in that Ricky Gervais and those above him see little
wrong with direct offenses towards certain groups, passing it simply as funny
(and it is), yet it is offensive to utter the F-word without directing it at
anyone in dissent (such as after dropping a brick on your foot). What is it
about certain words that offend people without any malicious intent? If I
slipped the S-word into an anecdote in replacement of ‘stuff’, why would it
offend anyone? Could they actually provide a valid answer regarding why they’re
offended?
I Googled why this group of words is considered offensive,
and most people agreed that we created the offensiveness because the words
themselves don’t have a whole lot behind them, but rather offense is
subjective. In this case, why do radio stations decide what their audience
finds offensive? Arghhh this interest of mine is evoking more questions than
it’s answering. I’m baffled.
I believe that any language goes. This comes back to what I consider
to be the primary topic of our studies: Language and Identity. The worst thing
someone can do is feel restricted or feel like they can’t be him or herself,
and I know for a fact that the way I speak or the way I speak is a huge part of
my identity. This has been the most all-over-the-place blog post that I’ve conjured
up, but it’s at times like the end of the holidays where you lack the ability
to construct a structural idea, and sometimes it’s nice to reveal the ramblings
of a madman.
Interesting rambling. I came of age in a much different context in which a lot taboo words were used too liberally and with offence. As a result, i've always found myself sensitive to language. Words like 'lame' irk me not due to speakers intent, but the potential unintended consequence where someone could be (and perhaps rightfully so) offended. Regardless I agree that this is an interesting topic and would like to teach in in the future. It just didn't seem like an appropriate choice in the UAE.
ReplyDelete