So, here I
am rapidly typing away in my physics lesson because I just looked at Managebac
and discovered that I had to do a blog post in response to our reading last
night and all I’ve done is a small paragraph answering half a question.
Good
English and Bad was
eyebrow-pluckingly boring, if that even is English. That being said, it was a
little bit interesting knowing the roots of our language and how it really is a
bunch of gibberish that a few people have made up and others have just
followed.
The questions
for us are: Given all the anomalies in the English Language, what is the
author saying suggesting about standards of usage? How does his discussion make
you feel about your own lapses in grammar?
Within this
essay, the author is suggesting that our standards of usage of English are
developed because those before us say that the language should be communicated
a certain way and others follow, eventually creating rules. He also conveys his
disagreement with the implementation of Latin grammar and influence.
Since I have
grown up learning English and only English, these rules have never had a
negative effect on me. As nice as it would be for verbs to be the same whether
they are past, present, future or plural, I have never known anything else and
as a result I have naturally adopted it. I make mistakes every now and then,
but it has never really bothered me.
I don’t look
forward to reading more essays like this, but I do look forward to the
knowledge and understanding I attain from them. Time to get this post up before
I get detention.
Next time apologize for forgetting about the post and then try to engage with the concept in a more meaningful way.
ReplyDelete